Ship a smaller, cheaper, quieter, higher-power product.
Fermi helps hardware teams optimize thermal designs before late testing turns heat into a launch blocker.
Find the thermal constraint while the design is still changeable.
Built for teams optimizing:
Baseline the design
Start from current CAD, heat loads, fan assumptions, vents, materials, and operating envelope.
Find the bottleneck
Identify where heat is trapped, airflow is wasted, or margin is being consumed.
Compare options
Test venting, fan, heatsink, layout, material, and derating changes without rebuilding setup.
Pick the tradeoff
Quantify which design gives the best size, cost, noise, power, and margin balance.
Fermi turns thermal simulation into a product tradeoff workflow, not just a plot-generation exercise.
Size, cost, acoustic noise, power output, and reliability are coupled. A bigger enclosure may solve heat but hurt packaging. A faster fan may buy margin but create noise. A higher power target may pass in CAD and fail in thermal validation.
Fermi helps teams test those tradeoffs earlier, while mechanical, electrical, and product constraints are still negotiable.
Do not discover the thermal limit after the product shape, BOM, and launch date are already fixed. Use simulation early enough to decide what can get smaller, cheaper, quieter, or more powerful without giving back reliability.
The best screenshots or GIFs should show the design loop: preparing a case, comparing variants, and turning physics output into a decision.
CAD cleanup
Show Fermi simplifying messy geometry and preserving thermal intent.
Variant comparison
Show fan, vent, heat sink, or enclosure options compared side by side.
Actionable result
Show the bottleneck, recommendation, and product tradeoff in one view.
Smaller packaging
Check whether enclosure volume, vent area, heat sink size, or spacing can be reduced without losing margin.
Lower system cost
Compare cheaper fans, simpler heat sinks, thinner materials, and lower-cost layouts against thermal performance.
Quieter operation
Evaluate fan speed, airflow path, ducting, and passive cooling options before noise becomes a product issue.
Higher power density
Validate whether more output, tighter placement, or a broader operating envelope is thermally credible.
Start with one design question: smaller, cheaper, quieter, higher-power, or safer against field failures.
Submit the current case
Share CAD, mesh, heat loads, fan curves, materials, operating conditions, or prior results.
Reconstruct the baseline
Fermi prepares the model and establishes the current thermal bottleneck and margin.
Generate variants
Compare geometry, airflow, cooling, placement, power, and derating changes from reusable setup.
Rank the tradeoffs
See which options improve size, cost, noise, power, or margin, and which create unacceptable risk.
Carry the model forward
Reuse the workflow as the design changes instead of restarting simulation setup every time.
| Late discovery | Earlier Fermi workflow |
|---|---|
| The enclosure is already tooled | Compare packaging limits before committing geometry. |
| The fan is too loud | Evaluate airflow and acoustic tradeoffs while fan strategy is still open. |
| The BOM is locked | Test lower-cost thermal paths before procurement hardens. |
| The product derates in validation | Find the thermal constraint before launch readiness depends on it. |
The value is not just faster simulation. It is preserving optionality while the product is still designable.
Power electronics
Increase output, reduce derating, or shrink the enclosure without creating hotspots.
Battery systems
Balance pack density, cooling strategy, operating envelope, and reliability.
EV charging and energy hardware
Validate high-power cabinets where uptime, ambient conditions, fan strategy, and serviceability interact.
Industrial and electromechanical systems
Reduce thermal risk in dense assemblies before late-stage testing forces mechanical changes.
Fermi helps teams use simulation when it can still change the product, not only when it can explain why the product failed.
The outcome is a tighter design loop: fewer late surprises, clearer tradeoffs, and more confidence in size, cost, noise, power, and reliability decisions.
Walk us through your geometry, and we'll schedule a working session around your actual validation criteria. If Fermi fits your use case, we'll proceed to a paid deployment with your team.